Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1637 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY CLAYTON FLEMING; RONALD NICHOLAS REGNERY; SCOTT GREGORY CROWLEY, SR.; CROWLEY & CROWLEY LAW FIRM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv—00423-REP-MHL) Submitted: September 25, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his “Petition for Pre-filing Motions and Amended Petition for Pre- filing of Motions and Responses.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Att’y Gen., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2