United States v. Blalock ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7304
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JACK BLALOCK, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-90-394, CA-95-1662-3-6)
Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Blalock, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Blalock, Nos. CR-90-394; CA-95-1662-3-6 (D.S.C. July 27, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2