Greene v. Maloff ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-6806
    VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARSHA MALOFF; THOMAS R. CORCORAN; JOEL N.
    BADGER; JEFFREY MYERS; CURTIS W. HENSON, Cor-
    rectional Officer; JOHN C. STEVENS, Captain;
    TAMMIE L. KIEL, Correctional Officer; JESSE D.
    WIGGINS, Lieutenant; CRAIG W. BLANK, Correc-
    tional Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-95-2987-JFM)
    Submitted:   November 7, 1996          Decided:     November 19, 1996
    Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
    cordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district
    court. Greene v. Maloff, No. CA-95-2987-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 24, 1996).
    We also note that Appellant's Eighth Amendment claim was properly
    dismissed for failure to provide evidence of a serious or signifi-
    cant injury or a substantial risk of serious harm. Shakka v. Smith,
    
    71 F.3d 162
    , 166 (4th Cir. 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for
    suspension of rules, remand, counsel and consolidation. We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-6806

Filed Date: 11/19/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021