Pearson v. Saar , 100 F. App'x 952 ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6555
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARY ANN SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S., et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
03-3642-RDB)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-
3642-RDB (D. Md. filed Mar. 18, 2004 & entered Mar. 19, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -