Mulu v. INS ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-1307
    KALEB MULU,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals. (No. A73-662-915)
    Submitted:    October 17, 2000          Decided:    November 13, 2000
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Onyebuchi N. Enechionyia, Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner.
    David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry,
    Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristen Giuffreda Chapman, Office of
    Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Kaleb Mulu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, seeks review of
    a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying
    his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have
    reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision, and
    find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that
    Mulu did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution and thus
    did not qualify for relief.   See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994);*
    Chen v. INS, 
    195 F.3d 198
    , 203-04 (4th Cir. 1999); Matter of   S-M-
    J-, Int. Dec. 3303, 
    1997 WL 80984
     at 8-9 (BIA Jan. 31, 1997);
    Matter of Dass, 
    20 I. & N. Dec. 120
     (BIA 1989); 8 C.F.R. 208.13(a),
    (b) (2000).
    We accordingly affirm the Board’s order.     We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
    ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    We note that 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994), was repealed by
    the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of
    1996 (IIRIRA) effective April 1, 1997. Because this case was in
    transition at the time the IIRIRA was passed, 8 U.S.C.
    § 1105a(a)(4) is still applicable here under the terms of the
    transitional rules contained in § 309(c) of the IIRIRA.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-1307

Filed Date: 11/13/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014