United States v. Jones ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-6406
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SAM EDWARD JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-89-19-BO, CA-96-1072-5-BO)
    Submitted:   July 2, 1998                   Decided:   July 16, 1998
    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Sam Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assis-
    tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
    error. We decline to address the district court’s comment that
    Appellant actively employed the gun because we find that the
    district court properly found the record clearly indicates that the
    jury found that Appellant “carried” a gun, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c) (1994). See United States v. Hudgins, 
    120 F.3d 483
    ,
    487 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we find that the district court
    properly determined that Appellant “carried” a gun during and in
    relation to a drug trafficking crime. We therefore deny a certif-
    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
    the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-89-19-BO; CA-
    96-1072-5-BO   (E.D.N.C.   Mar.   6,   1997).   We   dispense   with   oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-6406

Filed Date: 7/16/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021