Sindram v. Sengel ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1414
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. RANDOLPH SENGEL; DIETRA Y. TRENT; MARK R.
WARNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-1-A)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko,
O’CONNELL, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland; Martha
Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Sindram appeals the district court’s amended
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Sindram v. Sengal, No. CA-04-1-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 24,
2004). We deny Sindram’s motion for oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -