Chapman v. Earley ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1935
TOMMY LEE CHAPMAN; MARYANNE CHAPMAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
MARK L. EARLEY, Attorney General of Virginia;
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-223-3)
Submitted: November 7, 2000 Decided: November 21, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Lee Chapman, Maryanne Chapman, Appellants Pro Se. Gregory E.
Lucyk, Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Lee Chapman and Maryanne Chapman appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chapman v.
Earley, No. CA-00-223-3 (E.D. Va. June 16, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2