Bahilu v. Ashcroft ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2285
GIEDAY BAHILU,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A75-363-095)
Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 25, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, THE WRIGHT LAW NETWORK,
Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant
Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, John
D. Williams, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gieday Bahilu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its previous
order denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bahilu’s motion to
reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003) (setting forth
standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Bahilu, No. A75-363-095
(B.I.A. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -