Toure v. Holder , 417 F. App'x 345 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-1685
    FATOUMATA TOURE,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   February 28, 2011              Decided:   March 18, 2011
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,
    Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General,
    Ada E. Bosque, Senior Litigation Counsel, Matthew A. Spurlock,
    OFFICE   OF  IMMIGRATION   LITIGATION,  Washington,  D.C.,   for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Fatoumata Toure, a native and citizen of the Ivory
    Coast,   petitions       for    review   of    an   order   of   the    Board   of
    Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider.
    We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of
    discretion.      
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
    (a) (2010); Narine v. Holder, 
    559 F.3d 246
    , 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 
    435 F.3d 475
    ,
    481 (4th Cir. 2006).           To succeed on a motion to reconsider, the
    movant must specify an error of fact or law in the Board’s prior
    decision.    See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
    (b)(1) (2010).
    We    have     reviewed      the    administrative      record      and
    conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
    Toure’s motion to reconsider.            Accordingly, we deny the petition
    for review for the reasons stated by the Board.                        See In re:
    Toure, (B.I.A. May 21, 2010).                We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-1685

Citation Numbers: 417 F. App'x 345

Judges: Hamilton, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 3/18/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023