United States v. Shontonio Witherspoon , 521 F. App'x 226 ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6329
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHONTONIO L. WITHERSPOON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:08-cr-00844-PMD-1)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shontonio L. Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shontonio L. Witherspoon appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the
criminal judgment entered in his case in 2010. Rule 60,
however, is applicable only in civil cases; it is not a
mechanism available to reopen or overturn a criminal judgment.
See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.
2010) (holding that a district court has no authority to grant a
motion to reconsider its previous order denying an 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion). And in any event, it is evident from the
record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Witherspoon’s motion. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d
496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2