In re: McKinney v. ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6733 In re: AARON MCKINNEY, SR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-557-1) Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 12, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron McKinney, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Aaron McKinney, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court in resolving an issue we remanded to the district court. The district court has since answered the question. See McKinney v. Attorney Gen. of N.C., No. CA-98-557-1 (M.D.N.C. June 5, 2000). Accordingly, we deny the man- damus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2