Farley v. Rose , 2 F. App'x 378 ( 2001 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2066
DAVID P. FARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GLENN ROSE; WAYNE JARNISON; BETTY KIEFIN; JIM
JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-552-5-BR)
Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: January 26, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David P. Farley appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 2000). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Farley v. Rose, No. CA-00-552-5-BR (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2