Jose Zavala v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 436 F. App'x 276 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-2110
    JOSE BOANERGE ZAVALA,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; JANET NAPALITANO,           Secretary   of
    Department of Homeland Security,
    Respondents.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   June 2, 2011                    Decided:   June 29, 2011
    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joe W. Nesari, JW LAW, P.C., Herndon, Virginia, for      Petitioner.
    Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, David             V. Bernal,
    Assistant Director, Lindsay W. Zimliki, Office of        Immigration
    Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,         Washington,
    D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jose       Boanerge    Zavala,     a   native       and    citizen      of    El
    Salvador, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s
    decision     denying,         as    a    matter      of     discretion,          Zavala’s
    application       for     a    waiver     under     former        § 212(c)       of      the
    Immigration       and     Nationality      Act.           Because      Zavala       is   an
    aggravated felon, we lack jurisdiction to review his order of
    removal,    see    
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a)(2)(C)        (2006),       except      to   the
    extent Zavala raises constitutional claims and questions of law.
    See   
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a)(2)(D)        (2006).         We    have    reviewed        the
    administrative record and Zavala’s claim that he was denied due
    process at his removal hearing, and we find that his claim lacks
    merit.     See Anim v. Mukasey, 
    535 F.3d 243
    , 256 (4th Cir. 2008);
    Dekoladenu v.       Gonzales,      
    459 F.3d 500
    ,    508    (4th    Cir.      2006).
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
    stated by the Board.           See In re: Zavala (B.I.A. Sept. 3, 2010).
    We    dispense     with   oral     argument     because     the       facts   and     legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-2110

Citation Numbers: 436 F. App'x 276

Judges: Hamilton, Keenan, King, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/29/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023