Vinaben Patel v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 555 F. App'x 229 ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1882
VINABEN MANUBHAI PATEL; MANUBHAI PATEL,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 4, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014
Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rishi P. Oza, ROBERT BROWN LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, for
Petitioners. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General,
Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Lindsay B. Glauner, Office
of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vinaben Manubhai Patel and Manubhai Patel, natives and
citizens of India, petition for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing their appeal from
the immigration judge’s order finding that Vinaben Patel, the
primary petitioner, was not eligible for adjustment of status.
The Petitioners claim that the Board erred in this regard. We
deny the petition for review.
We review administrative findings of fact for
substantial evidence and will consider those findings conclusive
unless any reasonable adjudicator would have been compelled to
conclude to the contrary. Legal issues determined by the Board
are reviewed de novo. Abdel-Rahman v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 444,
448 (4th Cir. 2007). We have thoroughly reviewed the record
and conclude that the factual findings are supported by
substantial evidence and there was no error regarding the legal
issues.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2