Tina Jenkins v. MV Transportation ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 18-1273
    TINA JENKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-00702-TDC)
    Submitted: September 18, 2018                               Decided: September 20, 2018
    Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tina Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH
    SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tina Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment
    to MV Transportation, Inc. in Jenkins’ employment action. Parties to a civil action are
    accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an
    appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the district court may extend the time to
    file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30
    days after the expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect
    or good cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); see Washington v.
    Bumgarner, 
    882 F.2d 899
    , 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of
    appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    ,
    214 (2007).
    The district court’s final judgment was entered on the docket on January 25, 2018.
    Jenkins’ notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2018, after the expiration of the 30-day
    appeal period but within the excusable neglect period. Because Jenkins’ notice of appeal
    offered some excuse for her untimeliness and requested that the district court accept her
    notice of appeal upon receipt, we construe it as a timely request for an extension of time
    to file an appeal. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing
    the district court to determine whether the time for filing a notice of appeal should be
    extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The record, as supplemented, will then be
    returned to this court for further consideration.
    REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1273

Filed Date: 9/20/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021