Daniel Blue v. United States , 549 F. App'x 230 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-7123
    DANIEL BLUE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00121-FPS-DJJ)
    Submitted:   December 30, 2013             Decided:   January 13, 2014
    Before AGEE and    FLOYD,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Daniel Blue, Appellant Pro Se.    Jarod James Douglas, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel       Blue     appeals        the    district        court’s        order
    accepting      the     recommendation         of        the    magistrate       judge     and
    dismissing        Blue’s    claim    under        the    Federal      Tort      Claims    Act
    (“FTCA”)     for     lack   of    subject     matter          jurisdiction.        We     have
    reviewed     the     record   and    find     no    reversible        error.       Blue    v.
    United States, No. 5:12-cv-00121-FPS-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. May 3,
    2013). *     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal      contentions      are   adequately        presented        in   the     materials
    before     this    court    and   argument        would       not   aid   the    decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    Even assuming, as Blue suggests, that the mailbox rule
    applies in the FTCA context, we conclude that Blue’s filing of
    his administrative claim with the wrong agency does not warrant
    constructive filing under the circumstances of this case.    See
    Hart v. Dep’t of Labor ex rel. United States, 
    116 F.3d 1338
    ,
    1340 (10th Cir. 1997) (finding no constructive filing because
    claimant failed to file in a timely manner with the prior agency
    and the untimeliness could not be attributed to any dilatory
    conduct on the part of a federal agency).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-7123

Citation Numbers: 549 F. App'x 230

Judges: Agee, Floyd, Hamilton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/13/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023