Kevin Bridgers v. Justin Andrews ( 2019 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6820
KEVIN EUGENE BRIDGERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN ANDREWS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-hc-02105-D)
Submitted: October 17, 2019 Decided: October 22, 2019
Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Eugene Bridgers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin E. Bridgers appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) and denying his motion for
reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bridgers’ informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bridgers has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Bridgers’ motion to remand and affirm the district
court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2