De'Lonta v. Johnson ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-7282
    OPHELIA DE’LONTA, f/k/a M. Stokes, f/k/a Michael A. Stokes,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GENE    JOHNSON;    ROBIN    HULBERT;    ALVIN    BASKERVILLE;
    E. BARKSDALE; MAGGIE NEAL; SUSAN CARSON; SHANDA W. DAWKINS;
    MAJOR LEWIS; MAJOR ROWLETTE; DR. FISHER; D. KECK; DAWN
    GOODE; CPT. ALLEN; EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden; W. P. ROGERS,
    Regional Director; G.K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director;
    OFFICER    LEE,   Correctional    Officer;   OFFICER    MOSBY,
    Correctional Officer; OFFICER WHITHEY, Correctional Officer;
    OFFICER   COSBY,   Correctional    Officer;   OFFICER   BLUNT,
    Correctional Officer; OFFICER FLEMING, Correctional Officer;
    OFFICER GRAY, Correctional Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    Theresa C. Buchanan,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-01469-TCB)
    Submitted:    February 26, 2009             Decided:   March 5, 2009
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ophelia De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
    Attorney   General,   Richmond,   Virginia, Elizabeth   Martin
    Muldowney,   RAWLS   &   MCNELIS,       PC,   Richmond,   Virginia,   for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Ophelia      De’Lonta    appeals      the        magistrate       judge’s
    stipulation of dismissal order. *               We have reviewed the record and
    find        no    reversible     error.     Accordingly,           we    affirm    for   the
    reasons          stated   by   the   magistrate   judge       in    her    order    denying
    De’Lonta’s motion to dismiss settlement.                       De’Lonta v. Johnson,
    No. 1:05-cv-01469-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 2 & entered July 3,
    2008).           We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal       contentions        are   adequately   presented         in    the     materials
    before       the    court      and   argument   would   not        aid    the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
    judge pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2006).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-7282

Filed Date: 3/5/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021