Mohammad Awad v. Loretta Lynch , 600 F. App'x 892 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1932
    MOHAMMAD SWAILEM AWAD,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   April 20, 2015                 Decided:   April 30, 2015
    Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    W. Rob Heroy, GOODMAN, CARR PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant Attorney General,
    Keith I. McManus, Senior Litigation Counsel, Matt A. Crapo,
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mohammad    Swailem       Awad,    a   native      and   citizen      of   Jordan,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its affirmance
    of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Awad’s application
    for adjustment of status as a matter of discretion.                              We have
    reviewed the administrative record and Awad’s claim that the
    agency    exceeded      its   authority          by   improperly    questioning      him
    about his marriage, and find his claim to be without merit. *                         We
    accordingly      find    no   abuse     of       discretion    in    the    denial    of
    reconsideration, see Narine v. Holder, 
    559 F.3d 246
    , 249 (4th
    Cir. 2009), and deny the petition for review for the reasons
    stated by the Board.            See In re: Awad (B.I.A. Aug. 12, 2014).
    We   dispense    with    oral    argument         because    the    facts   and    legal
    contentions     are     adequately      presented       in   the    materials     before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    *
    While we normally lack jurisdiction to review the
    discretionary denial of adjustment of status, see 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a)(2)(B) (2012), we retain jurisdiction here because Awad
    has raised a question of law in his petition for review. See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a)(2)(D) (2012).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1932

Citation Numbers: 600 F. App'x 892

Filed Date: 4/30/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023