Jaswinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 599 F. App'x 490 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1705
    JASWINDER SINGH,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   March 20, 2015                 Decided:   April 1, 2015
    Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alan M. Kaufman, KAUFMAN & KAUFMAN, San Francisco, California,
    for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant Attorney
    General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Nicole N. Murley,
    Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jaswinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions
    for   review    of   an    order       of   the      Board    of   Immigration     Appeals
    (Board)   dismissing        his        appeal       from     the   Immigration    Judge’s
    denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal and
    protection      under     the     Convention          Against      Torture.       We    have
    thoroughly      reviewed         the     administrative            record   and    Singh’s
    contentions on appeal, and conclude that substantial evidence
    supports the Board’s decision.                      See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992).              Additionally, we have reviewed Singh’s
    claim that he was denied due process at his hearing and find
    such claim to be without merit.                      See Anim v. Mukasey, 
    535 F.3d 243
    , 256 (4th Cir. 2008).                We accordingly deny the petition for
    review for the reasons stated by the Board.                           See In re: Singh
    (B.I.A. June 25, 2014).                We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials      before     this    court     and       argument      would   not   aid    the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1705

Citation Numbers: 599 F. App'x 490

Filed Date: 4/1/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023