-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CALVIN WESTLEY SETTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RONALD EARP; MINDA FOXWELL; HOWARD HALL; MICHAEL DARRELL GAMBRILL; MARY K. WARD, No. 99-1245 in both their official and individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and TERRY SHERIDAN, Chief of Police, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97-651-AMD) Argued: December 3, 1999 Decided: January 24, 2000 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and Margaret B. SEYMOUR, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation. _________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Gary Howard Simpson, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appel- lant. Paul McLane Mayhew, Assistant County Attorney, BALTI- MORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Virginia Wood Barnhart, County Attorney, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Calvin Westley Settle appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of his employer, Baltimore County Police Department, and other defendants on Settle's claims of racial discrim- ination and retaliation.1 See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3 (West 1994). Finding no error, we affirm. I. The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to Settle, are as fol- lows. Settle is an African-American police officer with the Baltimore County Police Department (the Department). Beginning in 1992, Set- tle experienced what he perceived to be several acts of race discrimi- nation. Settle filed his first EEOC complaint on March 2, 1993. Additionally, Settle and another African-American officer filed an internal complaint on March 26, 1993, which launched a departmental investigation. Continuing to believe that he was being subjected to _________________________________________________________________ 1 Although Settle brought several claims in the district court, he pursues only the racially hostile environment and retaliation claims in this appeal. 2 discriminatory treatment, Settle filed a second EEOC complaint in September 1994. The departmental investigation was completed in December 1994 and concluded that the officers' allegations were unfounded. Settle continued to experience adverse actions that he believed were racially motivated, including a negative performance evaluation issued by his supervisor. In April 1996, Settle was notified that he was being trans- ferred to another division within the Department. Settle thereafter filed this action, alleging, inter alia, that he had been subjected to a racially hostile work environment and that he had been transferred in retaliation for his complaints about race discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of all defen- dants. See Settle v. Baltimore County,
34 F. Supp. 2d 969(D. Md. 1999). With respect to the hostile environment claim, the court rea- soned that Settle failed to proffer sufficient evidence that the incidents he cited to support the claim were racially motivated or were "suffi- ciently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive atmosphere."2 Causey v. Balog,
162 F.3d 795, 801 (4th Cir. 1998). With respect to the retaliation claim, the court rea- soned that Settle failed to establish his prima facie case because he had not been subjected to an adverse employment action. See Beall v. Abbott Lab.,
130 F.3d 614, 619 (4th Cir. 1997). II. After reviewing the parties' briefs and the applicable law, and hav- ing had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED _________________________________________________________________ 2 On appeal, Settle references incidents in support of his hostile envi- ronment claim that he had argued to the district court supported a dispa- rate treatment claim. 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 99-1245
Filed Date: 1/24/2000
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014