M. Raja v. Segan, Mason & Mason, PC ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1811 M. NAWAZ RAJA; NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SEGAN, MASON & MASON, PC; AIMEE T. H. KESSLER; ANDREW P. HILL; WILLIAM BRADLEY MASON, JR.; ELIZABETH M. CREGO; MARY ELLEN DEATLEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00418-TSE-IDD) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M. Nawaz Raja; Neelum Nawaz Raja, Appellants Pro Se. John Elphinstone McIntosh, Jr., HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: M. Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Raja v. Segan, Mason & Mason, P.C., No. 1:13-cv-00418-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 2013, and entered June 18, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2