United States v. Robert Bowling ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-7166
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERT GARTRELL BOWLING,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville.    Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (6:09-cr-00894-HMH-1; 6:13-cv-00451-HMH)
    Submitted:   November 19, 2013             Decided: November 22, 2013
    Before WYNN and    FLOYD,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Gartrell Bowling, Appellant Pro Se.       William Jacob
    Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Gartrell Bowling seeks to appeal the district
    court’s   order   denying    in    part      and    granting    in    part   his   28
    U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion, as well as its order
    denying   his   Fed.   R.   Civ.   P.     59(e)     motion.      This    court     may
    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
    (2006),   and   certain     interlocutory          and   collateral     orders,    28
    U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
    Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                         The orders
    Bowling seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable
    interlocutory     or   collateral       orders.          See   United   States     v.
    Hadden, 
    475 F.3d 652
    (4th Cir. 2007).                    Accordingly, we dismiss
    the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                     We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-2044

Filed Date: 11/22/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014