Kevin Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-6988
    KEVIN RAZZOLI,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT CLERK, (MD.Pa.); WARDEN FCI GILMER,
    (Nominal); PRESIDENT G. W. BUSH; ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL B.
    MUKASEY; PAST ATTORNEY GENERAL(S), (Known & Unknown);
    SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, (Present); SECRETARY OF NAVY ENGLAND,
    (Past); FIVE US PAROLE COMMISSIONER'S; PSYCHOLOGY DEPT.
    B.O.P. & C.I.A.; US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, (Executive Branch);
    NAVAL INVESTIGATION SERVICE; ROBERT MUELLER, Federal Bureau
    of Investigation Dir.; UNKNOWN STATE & LOCAL NEW JERSEY, NEW
    YORK,   PENNSYLVANIA,  Law   Enforcement  Agencies;  UNKNOWN
    FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT & INTELLIGENCE, Agency(s),
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins.      John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES)
    Submitted:   November 21, 2013             Decided:   November 25, 2013
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kevin Razzoli, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin     Razzoli,    a     federal    prisoner,          appeals     the
    district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion to reopen
    his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition and
    denying reconsideration.        We have reviewed the record and find
    no reversible error.        Accordingly, although we grant leave to
    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
    the district court.        Razzoli v. Middle Dist. Court Clerk, No.
    2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. May 28 & June 12, 2013).                       We
    dispense   with     oral   argument     because       the    facts     and     legal
    contentions   are   adequately       presented   in    the   materials       before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-6988

Filed Date: 11/25/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014