Luecretia Owens-El v. Lieutenant Kapfhammer ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1474
    LUECRETIA DAWN OWENS-EL, f/k/a Luecretia Dawn McNair-Bey;
    CHE' QUADAFFI WILLIAMS-EL,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    LIEUTENANT KAPFHAMMER; GEORGE GITHARA, Officer; CHRISTIAN V.
    KAIKAI, Officer; JOSEPH LANDSMAN,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE
    #5; JOHN DOE #6, Office all of and from the Western District
    Police Station for the Baltimore City Police Department; D.
    M. ROSS, Sergeant,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.     J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:10-cv-03213-JFM)
    Submitted:   November 21, 2013              Decided:   November 25, 2013
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Luecretia Dawn Owens-El, Che’ Quadaffi Williams-El, Appellants
    Pro Se. Michael Lawrence Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER,
    PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Suzanne Sangree, BALTIMORE CITY LAW
    DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Luecretia Dawn Owens-El and Che’ Quadaffi Williams-El
    appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42
    U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.           We have reviewed the record and
    find   no    reversible   error.     Accordingly,     we   affirm   for    the
    reasons stated by the district court.            Owens-El v. Kapfhammer,
    No. 1:10-cv-03213-JFM (D. Md. filed Mar. 8, 2013, entered Mar.
    11, 2013; Aug. 22, 2012; filed May 13, 2011, entered May 16,
    2011).      We grant the motion for an extension of time, deny the
    motion      for   appointment   of   counsel    and   dispense   with     oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1474

Filed Date: 11/25/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014