Kumar v. Cahill ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2375
ALOK KUMAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. CAHILL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96-
2435-L)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Kumar v. Cahill, No. CA-96-2435-L (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2