United States v. George ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6392
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-78)
Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998
Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth,
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing his request for Brady* material. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find, that to the extent the
order is reviewable, cf. North Carolina Ass’n of Black Lawyers v.
North Carolina Bd. of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976),
the denial of the motion was not erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-
78 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 3, 1998); see also Rule 6(a) of the Rules Gov-
erning Section 2255 Proceedings. We also deny George’s motion to
consolidate this appeal with his earlier appeal in United States v.
George, No. 98-6148 (4th Cir. June 23, 1998) (unpublished), because
this court’s opinion in the earlier appeal has already been filed.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the material before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
2