State ex rel. Barnett v. Doe , 143 S.W.3d 655 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Steven Barnett appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his criminal complaint because it was not signed by the Prosecuting Attorney or Attorney General.

    We have reviewed Barnett’s brief and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No errors of law appear. An extended opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 84349

Citation Numbers: 143 S.W.3d 655

Judges: Gaertner, Shaw, Sullivan

Filed Date: 9/7/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/2/2021