Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections , 437 F. App'x 235 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-7607
    GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD;
    WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISON,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.   Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:07-cv-00514-REP)
    Submitted:   June 30, 2011                 Decided:   July 5, 2011
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,
    Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory    A.    Richardson     seeks    to   appeal   the    district
    court’s order dismissing without prejudice his motions for stay
    and for injunctive relief, filed in his 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West
    Supp. 2010) action.         The district court noted that it lacked
    jurisdiction   to    rule   on   Richardson’s       motions   because     he   had
    previously filed a notice of appeal.               The filing of a notice of
    appeal “confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests
    the district court of its control over those aspects of the case
    involved in the appeal.”          Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc.
    Co., 
    459 U.S. 56
    , 58 (1982).        Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
    on the reasoning of the district court.              Richardson v. Va. Dep’t
    of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00514-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2010).                       We
    dispense   with     oral    argument     because     the   facts    and    legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-7607

Citation Numbers: 437 F. App'x 235

Judges: Duncan, Per Curiam, Wilkinson, Wynn

Filed Date: 7/5/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023