Alford v. NC Dept of Corr ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7124
LEE ODIS ALFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MACK JARVIS; PATRICIA L. CHAVIS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-663-5-H)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Odis Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lee Odis Alford appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Alford v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correc-
tion, No. CA-98-663-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2