Cromer v. Kraft Foods, Inc. , 89 F. App'x 385 ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2424
DONALD G. CROMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KRAFT FOODS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-03-346-3)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald G. Cromer, Appellant Pro Se. Hamlet Sam Mabry, III, James
Derrick Quattlebaum, HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A., Greenville,
South Carolina; Susan Pyle Dion, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Charlotte,
North Carolina; Joel H. Spitz, Christy E. Phanthavong,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
*
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d).
PER CURIAM:
Donald G. Cromer appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the
district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cromer v.
Kraft Foods, Inc., No. CA-03-346-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 15, 2003 &
entered Sept. 16, 2003; filed Oct. 23, 2003 & entered Oct. 24,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -