Mark Ivan Bedford v. Richard A. Young George Deeds Maggie Watkins Susie Cox , 70 F.3d 1260 ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • 70 F.3d 1260

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
    Mark Ivan BEDFORD, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Richard A. YOUNG; George Deeds; Maggie Watkins; Susie
    Cox, Defendants--Appellees.

    No. 95-6308.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

    Dec. 5, 1995.

    Mark Ivan Bedford, Appellant Pro Se.

    Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bedford v. Young, No. CA-95-79-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-6308

Citation Numbers: 70 F.3d 1260

Filed Date: 12/5/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021