Tommy Williams v. Vanessa Crawford , 449 F. App'x 288 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-7134
    TOMMY WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    VANESSA CRAWFORD, Sheriff,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:11-cv-00544-CMH-TRJ)
    Submitted:   October 4, 2011                 Decided:   October 11, 2011
    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tommy Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tommy    Williams,        a     Virginia     inmate,       brought     this     
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006) action after correctional officials seized
    various    items    of   his   personal          property.       The    district      court
    dismissed    his    complaint        pursuant      to    28    U.S.C.    §    1915A(b)(1)
    (2006),    and    Williams     now        appeals.       Because       Williams      had    an
    adequate    post-deprivation          remedy       under      Virginia       law   for     the
    allegedly    wrongful     confiscation,            his     property     was    not    taken
    without due process.            Hudson v. Palmer, 
    468 U.S. 517
    , 533-36
    (1984).     Nor has Williams alleged that any interference with his
    legal mail caused him to suffer actual detriment to a legal
    proceeding.        See Lewis v. Casey, 
    518 U.S. 343
    , 349-51 (1996);
    White v. White, 
    886 F.2d 721
    , 723 (4th Cir. 1989).                           Accordingly,
    we affirm the judgment of the district court.                          We dispense with
    oral   argument      because        the    facts     and      legal    contentions         are
    adequately       presented     in    the     materials        before    the    court       and
    argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-7134

Citation Numbers: 449 F. App'x 288

Judges: Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wynn

Filed Date: 10/11/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023