Windsor v. Compton ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6452
ANDREW WINDSOR, a/k/a Darryl Thomas, a/k/a
Andrew Wilson, a/k/a John Carlton Harris,
a/k/a Joseph Williams,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. G. COMPTON; DEJESUE; DAVID ROFF, Health
Services Administrator; C. M. STRICKLAND; AW;
PHAM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-04-65-SGW)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Windsor appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his petition for writ of habeas
corpus, which the district court properly construed as a complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Windsor v. Compton,
No. CA-04-65-SGW (W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -