Adkins v. Holland , 87 F. App'x 886 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    William T. Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), all but one of his claims for disability pension benefits under the provisions of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan, and the order granting summary judgment to the Trustees of the Plan on his remaining claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adkins v. Holland, No. CA-02-249-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 2002 & Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1377

Citation Numbers: 87 F. App'x 886

Judges: Hamilton, Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd

Filed Date: 2/17/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023