Motley v. Virginia State Bar ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2265
VICTOR A. MOTLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA STATE BAR; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-05-427)
Submitted: April 7, 2006 Decided: April 25, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor A. Motley, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Victor A. Motley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Motley v.
Virginia State Bar, No. CA-05-427 (E.D. Va. Sept. 22, 2005). We
also deny Motley’s motion to recuse. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460
U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).
- 2 -