United States v. Daniel Watlington , 435 F. App'x 269 ( 2011 )

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a nunc pro tune order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny Watlington’s motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.