Barnard v. Durham ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7899
JOE DAVID BARNARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BILLY JOE DURHAM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-03-3321-6-20BI)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe David Barnard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joe David Barnard appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Barnard v. Durham, No. CA-03-3321-6-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -