Raheem Rahman v. Bobby Shearin ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6993
RAHEEM RAHMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; CHAPLAIN LAMP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00526-WMN)
Submitted: October 9, 2013 Decided: October 28, 2013
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raheem Abdul Rahman, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raheem Rahman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, in
which he asserted claims of religious discrimination, and
finding that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. ∗
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the
district court’s determination that Rahman failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
Rahman also sought to appeal the district court’s denial
of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We conclude that we lack
jurisdiction over an appeal from that motion because Rahman did
not file a new notice of appeal or amend his notice of appeal to
embrace the district court’s order. See Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(4)(B)(ii).
2