Marrow v. Roanoke Electric Membership Corp. , 224 F. App'x 241 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-2089
    VICTOR A. MARROW,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROANOKE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Its
    Board of Directors; DELORES AMASON; CAROLYN D.
    BRADLEY; CHESTER DELOATCH; JOHNNIE P. GARNER;
    KEN JERNIGAN; DARNELL LEE; MILLARD LEE; ROBERT
    RIDDICK; ALLEN SPELLER; CURTIS WYNN, Executive
    Vice-President & CEO; EVA WIGGINS, Vice-
    President of Human Resources,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (5:06-cv-00130-BR)
    Submitted:   March 21, 2007                 Decided:   April 20, 2007
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    D. Lynn Whitted, Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Laura
    J. Wetsch, WINSLOW WETSCH, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Victor A. Marrow appeals the district court’s order
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaint.          We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we
    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.         See Marrow v.
    Roanoke Elec. Membership Corp., No. 5:06-cv-00130-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug.
    7, 2006).     We deny Appellees’ motion for sanctions under Fed. R.
    App.   P.   38   because   we   cannot   conclude   Marrow   pursued   this
    litigation for malicious purposes, see Dyntel Corp. v. Ebner, 
    120 F.3d 489
    , 493 (4th Cir. 1997), or has previously filed numerous
    frivolous suits or appeals, see Foley v. Fix, 
    106 F.3d 556
    , 558
    (4th Cir. 1997).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-2089

Citation Numbers: 224 F. App'x 241

Judges: Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler

Filed Date: 4/20/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023