United States v. Charlette Johnson , 484 F. App'x 847 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-7293
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.      W. Earl Britt,
    Senior District Judge. (7:10-cr-00093-BR-1; 7:12-cv-00209-BR)
    Submitted:   September 21, 2012           Decided:   October 12, 2012
    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charlette Dufray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.   Jennifer P. May-
    Parker,   Assistant  United States  Attorney,  Raleigh,  North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Charlette Dufray Johnson seeks to appeal the district
    court’s         order   dismissing   without      prejudice    her     
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West Supp. 2012) motion.                 The order is not appealable
    unless      a    circuit   justice   or     judge    issues   a     certificate   of
    appealability.          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)(B) (2006).            A certificate
    of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of
    the denial of a constitutional right.”                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2).
    We   have       independently    reviewed      the   record   and    conclude    that
    Johnson has not made the requisite showing.                       Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *                      We
    dispense         with   oral    argument    because     the    facts    and     legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    Because Johnson’s § 2255 motion was dismissed without
    prejudice as premature, she is not precluded from filing a
    timely § 2255 motion after her convictions and sentence become
    final.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-7293

Citation Numbers: 484 F. App'x 847

Judges: Agee, Gregory, Per Curiam, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 10/12/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023