Thompson v. High Point Regional ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-1574
    SONYA Y. THOMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HIGH POINT REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-97-165-2)
    Submitted:   July 28, 1998                 Decided:   August 14, 1998
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Sonya Y. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill
    S. Stricklin, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Caro-
    lina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court’s judgment granting sum-
    mary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing her action brought
    under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
    and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to establish a prima
    facie case of race discrimination due to her discharge from employ-
    ment. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs., 
    134 F.3d 1222
    , 1228
    (4th Cir. 1998). She also failed to show the court abused its
    discretion in denying her motion for an extension of discovery and
    for appointment of counsel. See Strag v. Board of Trustees, Craven
    Community College, 
    55 F.3d 943
    , 954 (4th Cir. 1995); Miller v.
    Simmons, 
    814 F.2d 962
    , 966 (4th Cir. 1987). Finally, the issues
    raised for the first time on appeal regarding her claim under the
    Freedom of Information Act and her injuries are not properly before
    this court. See Karpel, 
    134 F.3d at 1227
    . Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. High Point Reg’l
    Hosp., No. CA-97-165-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
    ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-1574

Filed Date: 8/14/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021