J.D. Ex Rel. Davis v. Kanawha County Board of Education , 357 F. App'x 515 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-1239
    J.D., by his next friends; MARK DAVIS; TAMMY DAVIS,
    Plaintiffs – Appellants,
    v.
    KANAWHA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
    Defendant – Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston.  Joseph R. Goodwin,
    Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00167)
    Submitted:    December 7, 2009            Decided:   December 17, 2009
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mark Davis, Tammy Davis, Appellants Pro Se.      Vaughn Sizemore,
    BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mark and Tammy Davis appeal the district court’s order
    entering       judgment       in    favor   of     the    Kanawha     County     Board   of
    Education         on     their      claims        under      the     Individuals      with
    Disabilities Education Act, 
    20 U.S.C.A. §§ 1400-1482
     (West 2000
    &   Supp.     2009);     
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
        (2006);        the   Americans   with
    Disabilities           Act    of    1990,    
    42 U.S.C. § 12101
          (2006);      the
    Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 
    29 U.S.C. §§ 701
    -796l
    (2006), and the West Virginia Human Rights Act, 
    W. Va. Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1
     to 5-11-21 (LexisNexis 2006 & Supp. 2009).                              We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                           Accordingly,
    we affirm the district court’s judgment. *                         See Davis v. Kanawha
    County Bd. of Educ., No. 2:06-cv-00167 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 11,
    2008).        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal       contentions       are   adequately       presented       in   the    materials
    before      the   court       and   argument      would    not      aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    We previously affirmed the portion of the district court’s
    judgment granting the Davis’s attorney’s fees. See J.D. ex rel.
    Davis v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., 
    571 F.3d 381
     (4th Cir.
    2009).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1239

Citation Numbers: 357 F. App'x 515

Judges: King, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 12/17/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023