In Re: Meadows v. ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-1968
    In Re:   JERRY FRANKLIN MEADOWS, SR.; THERESA TUCKER MEADOWS,
    Debtors.
    -------------------------------
    DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS, LLC,
    Creditor - Appellant,
    v.
    JERRY FRANKLIN MEADOWS, SR.; THERESA TUCKER MEADOWS,
    Debtors - Appellees.
    -------------------------------
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS,
    Amicus Supporting Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.      William E. Anderson,
    Bankruptcy Judge. (BK-06-62050)
    Submitted:   August 28, 2008            Decided:   September 11, 2008
    Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stephen P. Hale, Jacob C. Zweig, HALE, DEWEY & KNIGHT, PLLC,
    Memphis, Tennessee; M. Richard Epps, Sara A. John, M. RICHARD EPPS,
    PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Steven L. Higgs, STEVEN L. HIGGS, PC,
    Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. David Cox, COX LAW GROUP, PLLC,
    Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.     Brett Weiss, Tara Twomey,
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS, Olney,
    Maryland, for Amicus Supporting Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, LLC, appeals
    directly from the bankruptcy court’s order overruling its objection
    to the Chapter 13 plan filed by the debtors, Jerry Franklin
    Meadows, Sr., and Theresa Tucker Meadows.      The bankruptcy court
    held that the bankruptcy code, as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse
    Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”), permits
    the   debtor   to   surrender   undersecured   collateral   in   full
    satisfaction of a secured claim.      In light of our decision in
    Tidewater Fin. Co. v. Kenney (In re Kenney), 
    531 F.3d 312
     (4th Cir.
    2008), we vacate the bankruptcy court’s orders and remand for
    further proceedings consistent with Kenney.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    VACATED AND REMANDED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1968

Filed Date: 9/11/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021