Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc. , 55 F. App'x 201 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • *202 PER CURIAM.

    Cynthia Lee Whitaker appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc., No. CA-02-96-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2275

Citation Numbers: 55 F. App'x 201

Judges: Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Traxler, Widener

Filed Date: 2/4/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023