Carol Pizzuto v. Scott Smith ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1534
    CAROL L. GRAY PIZZUTO,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    SCOTT R. SMITH; KEITH C. GAMBLE; STEPHEN M. FOWLER; D. LUKE
    FURBEE; OFFICER S. A. ZIMMERMAN; OFFICER D. L. ROBINSON;
    HONORABLE JAMES P. MAZZONE; HONORABLE ARTHUR M. RECHT;
    HONORABLE RONALD E. WILSON; KENNETH W. BLAKE; JULIE L.
    KREEFER; TONI VANCAMP, individually and collectively,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES)
    Submitted:   October 16, 2014             Decided:   October 20, 2014
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Carol L. Gray Pizzuto, Appellant Pro Se. Diane G. Senakievich,
    David Lee Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia;
    Stephen Mark Fowler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE,
    PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Kenneth Louis Hopper, PULLIN,
    FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia;
    Deva A. Solomon, Monte Lee Williams, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP,
    Morgantown, West Virginia; John Michael Hedges, Teresa Jean
    Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD, Morgantown, West Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Carol    L.    Gray   Pizzuto   appeals    the    district     court’s
    orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.                            We
    have     reviewed       the    record    and   find      no     reversible    error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.     Pizzuto v. Smith, No. 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va.
    July 1, 2013 & May 22, 2014).              We deny Pizzuto’s motion to file
    electronic media.             We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal    contentions     are   adequately       presented     in   the
    materials      before    this    court   and    argument      would   not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1534

Filed Date: 10/20/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014