Terry Campbell v. Ingles Market ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6989
TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INGLES MARKET, Ingles Store 92; MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FOLK;
TRAVIS TODD KING; KENNITH HAMMETT; NATHANIEL MARK RAINEY;
JOHN ALLEN PUTMAN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SPTG CO SHERIFFS DEPT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-01701-BHH-KFM)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Douglas Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Ross Culbreath,
Wilson Scarborough Sheldon, WILLSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY, P.A.,
Greenville, South Carolina; Nathaniel Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy
Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville,
South Carolina; James Alexander Timmons, CLAWSON & STAUBES,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Terry Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying reconsideration of its order dismissing some, but
not all, defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Campbell seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction and deny Campbell’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3