United States v. John Walter Steadman , 105 F.3d 649 ( 1997 )

105 F.3d 649

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Walter STEADMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6988.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1996.
Decided Jan. 3, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-93-122, CA-95-189-3-MU)

John Walter Steadman, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Steadman, Nos. CR93-122; CA-95-189-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED