Tyson v. Moats ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6571
DEMETRIUS TYSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
STARLING THORNTON,
Plaintiff.
versus
RONALD MOATS; R. SOWERS; DOCTOR POTTS; MS.
FUENTES; PAUL DAVIS; MARVIN ROBINSON; ROBERT
MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-648)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Demetrius Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Tyson appeals the district court's order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. To the extent Appel-
lant seeks to appeal the portions of the order dismissing several
of the claims without prejudice, the order is not appealable.
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). This court does not have jurisdiction over
those portions of the appeal and they must be dismissed. With
regard to the remaining claims, we have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm that portion of the order on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Tyson v. Moats, No. CA-96-648 (D. Md. Mar. 26, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART
3